The TIC Industry — What To Expect In 2008
Article by Stephen I. Burr
The current year, 2007, has presented unprecedented challenges to the Tenant-in-Common (TIC) industry, including:
- A declining base of anxious sellers of appreciated real estate looking for exchange opportunities
- Confusion and concern in the real estate debt capital markets
- Continued pressure on cap rates for quality real estate
- Rising costs associated with offerings
- A higher incidence of problem real estate
Despite all of these challenges, the TIC industry appears likely to
finish 2007 roughly equal to 2006, with about $4 billion in equity
raised. This is no small accomplishment given the sometimes chaotic
market conditions. But, what about 2008? Will market conditions
improve? How will the TIC industry respond? Here are a few preliminary
thoughts:
Sponsors
Sponsors are on the hot seat — decent real estate is too
expensive, debt is less available and more costly, costs are rising,
and investors want higher returns! An increasing number of sponsors
will find these challenges too daunting and they will leave the
industry. However, the strong will survive and benefit from the pruning
out of sponsors who over promise and under deliver. Some of the
strategies that the better sponsors will use include:
Selling Track Record
Relatively few sponsors have a meaningful track record. The
industry is still only 12 years old, with most of the growth in the
last five years since Rev. Proc. 2002-22, and with more than half of
the sponsors appearing in the last two years. A fierce debate is
already going on among Tenant-In-Common Association (TICA) members as
to how track records should be presented in Private Placement
Memorandums (PPMs). Sponsors who can demonstrate that they have
consistently performed as well or better than promised should have a
meaningful advantage as market conditions continue to be a challenge.
Selling Appreciation
Sophisticated real estate investors understand that real estate
always has appreciation as a significant component of the overall
return, and that too much focus on initial cash flow can be counter
productive to the quality of the asset, and put real stress on the
investment structure. Look for this message to be delivered with
increasing emphasis in the coming year.
It's the Real Estate
Bubbly market conditions over the past few years had pushed the
focus from risk to return. However, the events of the spring and summer
of 2007 in the real estate capital markets may have changed the
balance. Look for the deals to sell in 2008 that have lower risk, not
higher return. Important factors will include location in primary
markets, high-quality tenants, and acquisition cost below replacement
cost. TIC leverage will still be in the 50 percent range, which
translates to 60–65 percent of seller price, but interest-only features
will probably not extend beyond two to five years.
Broaden Distribution Channels
TIC offerings are shown to a relatively small percentage of
available like-kind exchange investors, particularly east of the
Mississippi. Sponsors simply cannot afford to leave those investment
dollars on the table. Look for sponsors to increasingly search out
financial joint venture partners with meaningful securities
distribution channels, (e.g., Ameriprise), and to build their own
internal distribution team.
Broaden Products
Is it possible to sell fractional interests in real estate
directly to investors without built-in tax incentives? Sponsors have
been bringing out a greater variety of real estate investment products
in the past year that are sold through the TIC distribution channel,
but which do not have like-kind exchange treatment as their central
feature. In addition, an increasing number of TIC offerings have gone
back to the former practice of a double or piggy-back offering,
simultaneously offering TIC and non-TIC interests.
Broker-Dealers
Why would anyone want to be a broker-dealer? Regulatory
scrutiny is increasing, costs are rising, successful sponsors
circumvent them, fees are being squeezed, and the broker-dealer is in
the cross-hairs if anything goes wrong. As with sponsors, some of the
weak broker-dealers will leave the industry. The better ones will
survive, increasing their efficiency and broadening their mix of
products.
Better Due Diligence
As with all financial intermediaries, time is money for
broker-dealers. They simply cannot afford to bring out marginal
sponsors and marginal projects. The third-party due diligence available
to broker-dealers was never intended to be a substitute for due
diligence by the broker-dealer. Expect the broker-dealer gatekeepers to
the TIC Industry to raise the barriers to entry for new sponsors and to
weed out marginal performers more quickly.
Broaden Product Lines
Just as the sponsors need to wean themselves from exclusive
reliance on TIC products, the broker-dealers need to find alternative
products to sell when the TIC market is slow, including funds,
note-offerings, or other products suitable for qualified plans, raw
land, permitting, or development stage deals and energy products. There
is a fair amount of risk associated with bringing out new products,
including up-front costs and the distraction. Successful new products
will have to be carefully thought out, with quality sponsors and
appropriate pricing.
Training
The generally accepted bottleneck in the TIC industry is
the relatively small number of properly trained registered
representatives. If the broker-dealers do not train the registered
representatives, who will? Now that the low hanging fruit is gone, the
need for well-trained registered representatives has never been
greater. Sponsors and broker-dealers will continue their efforts to
improve training of and communication with registered representatives.
Registered Representatives
The registered representatives are on the front lines. They
have to find qualified investors, establish a relationship with them,
understand their needs and gauge their suitability, and understand the
increasing complex products that are available to them. The good news
for the better representatives is that it is very difficult for most
representatives to do all of these things effectively. So if you can do
it, you can be very successful. In the coming year, expect the better
representatives to focus on:
Demanding Due Diligence
Representatives have enough to do without having to do the
sponsor's or the broker-dealer's job. Expect representatives
increasingly to refuse to look at offerings which are not accompanied
by meaningful sponsor, broker-dealer, and third-party due diligence.
The attitude will be do not just tell me the market and the rate, but
rather show me why this works, and avoid embarrassing me in front of my
clients.
Focus on Suitability
The turmoil in the poor credit home mortgage market should be a
cautionary tale for all representatives. Nothing is harder than
steering an apparently qualified, accredited investor away from
investment products based upon suitability. However, nothing is more
likely to come back to harm a representative than an investment sold to
an unsophisticated investor. Expect representatives to be more
selective in to whom they show products.
Load
Representatives have more time to dissect offerings these
days. One result should be a more critical eye on load, or the costs of
the offering. This really is not about how much money the sponsor is
putting in its pocket. It is more about is how much are the investors
paying for the asset. In times of modest or lower growth in the
commercial real estate market, paying 125 percent of the fair market
value to acquire a property may make it difficult to achieve the
projected 12–13 percent internal rate of return, or even get the
principal fully returned, in five to seven years.
Pressure on Fees
There is increasing pressure on the fees paid to registered
representatives. Can they hold the line at the current seven to eight
percent? Can they avoid deferral of some portion of the commission into
later years? Expect the better sponsors to refocus on this issue given
the current tight deal economics.
Conclusion
These are just a few thoughts about the coming year. The
underlying message is in positive markets even the less skillful and
less reputable can make money. When the market conditions deteriorate,
the smarter, more disciplined players will rise to the top. Expect that
to be the fundamental trend in 2008.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide
to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your
specific circumstances.
www.mondaq.com
|